The Blog.
Insights on Non-Profit Recruitment, Strategic Advice & Training

UK charity fundraising requires institution-wide leadership
Breaking Down Silos: Why UK Charity Fundraising Must Be Everyone's Business
An organisational failure, not a fundraising problem
The most damaging myth in UK charity management is that fundraising can operate effectively in isolation. As sector experts increasingly recognise, when fundraisers find themselves stuck in silos, "it's an organisational failure" that creates a "veritable Gordian knot" of structural complexity. The evidence from successful charities, regulatory guidance, and sector research is unequivocal: sustainable fundraising requires institution-wide integration, not departmental isolation.
The pattern is depressingly familiar. Fundraisers aren't involved in financial planning by those spending the money. Mission delivery teams work to long-term targets whilst fundraisers face short-term financial pressures. Communications departments inadvertently create barriers between fundraisers and programme staff. The result? Charities spend precious resources trying to override the very structures they've created.
Legal obligations demand leadership engagement
The UK regulatory framework makes senior leadership engagement in fundraising non-negotiable. The Charity Commission's CC20 guidance establishes that trustees are legally responsible for their charity's fundraising activities as part of core duties under charity law. Ultimate responsibility rests with trustees regardless of who conducts fundraising activities, requiring formal supervision arrangements, monitoring procedures, and board-level escalation processes.
This isn't bureaucratic box-ticking. Recent enforcement cases demonstrate real consequences of inadequate trustee fundraising oversight, with personal liability for financial losses and potential removal from office. The law prevents fundraising from being treated as separate operational activity, instead requiring integration into strategic governance and organisational accountability systems.
Successful integration delivers measurable results
UK universities provide compelling evidence of what integrated advancement achieves, with annual fundraising nearly doubling to £1.5 billion by 2022. The University of Leeds exemplifies best practice through integrated advancement teams combining fundraising, alumni relations, and advancement operations under unified leadership, with "individuals from different backgrounds who are experts in their fields, from fundraisers to data specialists" working toward strategically aligned objectives.
The charity sector shows similar success patterns. Research by Blackbaud reveals that growth in income is "inextricably linked to commitment from the top to digital transformation," with successful organisations prioritising connected workflows and data-driven decision making. Guide Dogs exemplifies this approach with their Chairman's clear articulation: "Everyone at Guide Dogs is a fundraiser."
Creating cultures where fundraising flourishes
Stephen Pidgeon, fundraising consultant and visiting professor at Plymouth University, emphasises from his work with nearly 200 national charities that success requires "true dialogue, real cooperation across departments and establishment of trust." The evidence consistently shows that effective fundraising demands energy spent linking closely with service-providing colleagues, not just external stakeholders.
Successful organisations demonstrate specific cultural characteristics: fundraising is valued rather than merely tolerated, fundraising "ownership" extends across other functions, and internal communication patterns support collaboration rather than competition. Research from University of Warwick shows happy workers are 12% more productive, with poor organisational culture costing the UK economy £23.6 billion annually through staff turnover. For charities, this translates directly into fundraising capacity and donor relationship continuity.
The leadership imperative
CEOs and Directors face clear responsibilities: demonstrate that fundraising is valued through personal engagement, invest in integration through connected systems, model fundraising engagement, and ensure fundraising strategy aligns with organisational mission. For Trustees, this extends beyond oversight to active championing, requiring fundraising literacy as core competency and asking probing questions about fundraising performance and strategy.
The transformation from siloed to integrated fundraising requires fundamental cultural and structural changes led from the top. However, the evidence shows that charities making this transition achieve better donor retention, improved productivity, enhanced reputation, and sustainable income growth—outcomes essential for effective charitable purpose delivery.
The choice facing UK charity leaders is clear: continue with organisational structures that undermine fundraising effectiveness, or embrace integration models that align legal obligations with operational success. The evidence overwhelmingly supports the latter approach, making institution-wide fundraising integration not just best practice, but organisational necessity.

Making the Case for External Fundraising Consultants: Delivering Value for UK Nonprofits
Are External Fundraising Consultants Worth the Investment? The Data Says Yes
UK nonprofits are struggling. With 79% reporting fewer donations due to economic conditions and operational costs rising faster than income, many charities face an uncomfortable truth: traditional fundraising approaches aren't working.
Yet while organizations debate whether they can afford external fundraising consultants, the evidence is overwhelming. Consultant-supported campaigns achieve 89% of their target goals compared to just 67% for internally-managed efforts. The return on investment? A remarkable £8.61 for every £1 spent.
So why do so many nonprofits still hesitate?
The objections are familiar: "We can't afford consultant fees," "They won't understand our mission," "We need to build internal capacity, not create dependency." These concerns feel legitimate when budgets are tight and every expense requires justification to trustees.
But here's what the data reveals: organizations that embrace strategic consultant partnerships don't just raise more money—they build stronger internal fundraising capabilities, improve donor retention by 23%, and generate 2.8 times more qualified major donor prospects.
The question isn't whether your nonprofit can afford external fundraising expertise. It's whether you can afford to continue without it.
From feasibility studies that provide data-driven confidence to governing bodies, to capital campaigns that transform organizational capacity, the right consultant partnership could be the difference between surviving and thriving in today's challenging funding landscape.
Ready to explore how external fundraising consultants could transform your nonprofit's financial sustainability? Our comprehensive analysis examines real UK case studies, addresses common objections, and provides a roadmap for successful consultant partnerships.